Tuesday, 16 April 2019
Fire!
I found it quite strangely hurtful to watch Notre Dame burn yesterday. Strange as I have never been there but I suppose it was because of the long history of the building and the billion euro's it will cost to repair. All that history lost in a few moments.
Already both the men renovating the building and a variety of Muslim groups have been unofficially blamed for starting the fire, the source of the blame having no evidence for any blame at any time naturally. Far too early for anyone to know the reason for the fire although firemen will have quickly worked out where it began and possibly how. We await the first evidence led report. This however will not stop alt-right groups blaming Islamic types and if evidence shows otherwise cries of 'whitewash' will follow.
The loss of such buildings brings a variety of reactions, not least from the media who love such disasters. Those 24 hour rolling news station have much to talk about, and repeat endlessly, all day and all night while waxing lyrical about the findings thereof. There has been sentimental guff flowing from many sides, much desire to see the 'Crown of Thorns' made safe alongside other treasures from the museum. Whether the thorns are indeed genuine I know not, if they are I would burn them before people worship them rather than Jesus. One report emphasised the image of the golden cross above the altar gleaming in the mirk as the firemen posed at the door. This was given heroic status while at the same time ignoring the real meaning of the cross, that would not sell to the public in the same manner.
I like and dislike such buildings. As interesting places to visit they are great, as history they tell us a great deal, especially when you follow the timeline down the years. However rarely are such places real churches! Ecclesiastical types who end up running these large buildings often have less interest in God than in ecclesiastical position. Bishops can indeed know their God but too many are so far from them they ought to be deposed. Such buildings are more heritage than Christian and a glance at the material sold in the church bookstall usually reveals where the church leaders stand.
I have been round Westminster Abbey, a marvellous building with many national hero's and kings buried therein but is it a church or a national institution? Durham Cathedral, where I had a short visit in the 90's is a tremendous sight, the columns just reach up into the heights and give a strange impression when you stare up at them. If only I had a camera then? Durham also contains the tomb of Bede the historian and Cuthbert the monk. Both are worth visiting but are they true churches? I doubt it. In the 80's the new Bishop of Durham made clear he did not believe in most biblical doctrines, the Virgin Birth was one given much publicity at the time, yet he was appointed because of his academic talents. This tells us much.
Like many Abbey's, cathedrals and churches in the UK this one reaches back probably to a Gaulish pagan site which over the years has had a small church erected upon it, as here a larger then even larger building is erected until in the 1100's this great Cathedral was begun. This would be dedicated no doubt to the glory of God but in truth such buildings are reflections of power, the Norman's rebuilt wooden Saxon churches in stone for this reason and vast stone cathedrals arose to impress upon the natives that they were the boss. Most natives would of course be impressed yet their lives would change little, sow, reap and suffer was always their lot.
As you know during 1185 Heraclius of Jerusalem called for the third crusade from the cathedral, and in 1481 Henry VI of England was crowned King of France here. Happier news in 1537 James V. King of Scots married Madeline of France while in 1558 Mary, Queen of Scots married the Dauphin, that turned out well. In 1804 Napoleon had himself crowned emperor by Pope Pius VII though I believe he took the crown and laid it upon his own head. 1831 the Victor Hugo novel about the hunchback was published creating a great interest in the building and leading to restoration work. This would have included the bells had he stopped swinging on them.
The vast number of people, clerics, congregation or workers who have passed through the building always impress me. Some came for God, some obediently, many in desperation, many in anger. The building has been the target of reformers and extremists with bombs, it has fans worldwide and cynics there also. The poorest in France will wonder at the millions to be spent on a building while they continue to live as they do. This building has seen many such societal differences!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I have to agree that so many cathedrals and grander churches have become monuments to man....when in France there was a tiny ancient church at Noize on the road we took to Poitiers, known as the chemin de St. Hilaire, the apostle of western France. The roof had collapsed at one time and been replaced with something much lower, it stood alone in the fields and it had a real air of sanctity.
Another event in the history if ND de Paris was when de Gaulle marched down the aisle on the liberation of Paris, being shot at from the galleries...
I have never seen Notre Dame either but I felt stunned and greatly sorrowful to see it burn. It is religion, beauty, history and culture all in one building and that is what I care about.
When we visit any church in England, we always leave money for its upkeep. (They always have a little box!) Everybody should even if it is not required.
Fly, Small out of the way churches often offer more to see.
Kay, Most open churches have a wee box for that.
Post a Comment