I sit here watching the ebbing sun attempt to make its way through the fast flowing clouds. How lovely is summer! That's the time of the year the sun positions itself high in the sky before being obscured by rain clouds. My delight at the brightness that shines through is matched by the delight of the birds that flit past as they head home for the night, umbrellas in hand. I wonder whether they will be able to listen to a young couple next door scream and shout and slap one another lovingly like I can? There is little more enjoyable than hearing a neighbours squabbles, although for a few minutes the entire town would have been listening in to this pair I suspect. If you must disagree in such like circumstances why can folks not learn to speak firmly and quietly rather than yell? If you like one another you will discuss frankly, not yell abuse. If however you are just living together because 'that's what you do' then split up now because you will later.
Another chap who got it wrong was the one who turned up at the house used as a mosque for the dozen or so Muslims around here. He got it wrong by carrying a flare, two knives and a lot of resentment. He may well hear arguments in that prison cell, I hope he doesn't have to share it with a Muslim! Many similar attacks have been reported elsewhere. The murder of the young soldier by the two Muslims the other day has awoken much resentment understandably. The attitude that 'if they don't like it here they can leave' is certainly understandable, especially after the way loud aggressive Muslim groups have 'appeared' to get away with their 'biting the hand that feeds them' behaviour. Groups such as the 'English Defence League' and such will not die out if such people are seen to be let off abusing our troops lightly. When situations like this arise all Muslims are likely to be at risk, and the majority appear happy to be here and cause no offence. This situation reminds me of the man in Sheffield (?) after 9/11. He entered a shop and bought some goods while abusing the owner because "You're lot are responsible." His long, loud abuse reflected the feeling of many that Islam is a violent religion. The shopkeeper however was on TV later explaining how he had pointed to his Turban and cried "I'm a Sikh!" The man was not deterred, facts cannot stop a Yorkshire mans opinion. The difficulty is keeping a cap on retaliation while also keeping the extreme Muslims quiet. Loud aggressive preachers who call for 'our boys' to be shot staying in the country, well provided for while fighting extradition, do not help of course. We pander to peoples all too often, instead we must stick to what is right and speak the truth at all times, even if it is not welcome.
That Sally Bercow has suffered today. Some time ago a suggestion was made that a one time cabinet minister in the Thatcher (BOO!) government had been involved with child abuse. A name was mentioned on 'social network' sites and 'accidentally' during a TV programme, Sally Bercow on Twitter indicating one man in particular was guilty. He was not pleased. He was not pleased as he was not guilty! Several others also implied his guilt and he instructed a lawyer to deal with them. Apologies and small sums of money have been paid, however the Tory individual believed there was more to this with Mrs Bercow. It must be explained that she is the wife of the Speaker of the House of Commons. The Speaker is a Tory MP, she a Labour Party member! On several occasions she has opened her gob and got into trouble, this time it has cost her a lot of money. The judge found her guilty of libel, (or was it slander? It would be defamation is Scotland) and she must apologise, pay a sum of compensation, and pay all the costs! Just imagine how much these lawyers charge! The web is not free from libel actions it would appear, in the same way the media is not free. Quite right too. But watch how you say things when naming names.
.
