I spent an enjoyable hour listening to a podcast from the 'National Archives.'
I knew about these but only recently began to listen to them. Today I listened to one from 2006.
Phillipa Glanville, from the V&A museum, discussing 'The Dichotomies of Drink.' Very interesting this was too. A clever woman, well researched, and clearly spoken, discussing drink from the late 1600s up until recent times. The development of whisky taught me much I did not know, the growth of beer in its many forms, wine, political intrusion and responses to European wars, and the public response during difficult times.
Water being rough if not impure led to much beer drinking, of a weak kind. War in Europe led to sales of whisky and rum growing. Drunkenness also grew alongside the increase in alcohol sales. Who would have thought...?
A good Podcast, and well worth a listen and I suspect many more also.
This is a good book!
Good that is if you like reading about ancient Mesopotamia!
I do.
Paul Kriwaczek, a Viennese, was head of Central Asian Affairs at the BBC World Service for 25 years. His wide knowledge of many languages no doubt aided his studies. This book was published in 2010, a year before he died.
Beginning by comparing Saddam Hussein with the great leaders who had gone before him millennia ago helps us understand, he says, how life in the region continues in similar fashion since settlement began. Human nature after all, does not change.
From Eridu in the south, where incoming peoples gathered around 5000 BC, through until the fall of Babylon to the Persians and the end of what the author calls the 'first stage' in civilisation, we follow the development of the various societies and indeed Pauls interesting, but not always correct thoughts on the matter.
Paul was an intelligent and thoughtful man, however, some of his opinions were lacking in my view, indeed, somewhat idiosyncratic I would say. His view on what was the 'Flood,' is worth reading, but somehow lacks substance to me.
We hear of the rise of the Sumer super states, Ur and Uruk, the opposition from Elam, and the constant flow of peoples throughout time who eventually take over and, according to the author, continue the culture that they find.
We read of Gilgamesh, and the various people who brought the rise and fall, and rise again, of Babylon and then Assyria. Famous names such as Hammurabi pass by, less famous names come and go, leaving a mark in their day and going the way of all flesh into obscurity.
Of course the rise of both Babylon and Assyria, and her fall, takes up some room. Both, thanks to scripture, are renown in the west, though not accurately I suggest. Paul describes the situation at various times attempting to enliven the image, he makes a story of the situation, often I found quite well, and throughout the book he remains easily readable, even I could understand the big words.
The study of those clay tablets covered in 'cuneiform' have offered us much detail on the life of people in the area. This includes letters from a wife to her far off husband complaining about what he has taken with him on business, or detailing her efforts to sell the goods he has sent back from far off.
It amazes me how much detail can be found, and it is exciting to consider how many thousands of these tablets have still to be translated.
We see the rise and fall of Assyria, her determination never to be put down again, resulting in her harsh treatment of those who resist. Our author details also Assyria's harsh treatment of women, so harsh that it is possible to see how Islam can regard their treatment of women as protective!
States cannot exist for ever under violence, eventually people rebel. Babylon took over for a period, then the Persians ended this period of life. Things were never the same again.
Ancient Sumer, and those that came after, developed the sciences as far as possible in their day. Much of the maths known to the Greeks was already found in Ur and Uruk. Architecture and art developed quickly, agriculture, in spite of mistakes, fed the people well, and life developed from Temple led authority governing an organised society, to a more 'free enterprise' world under the Kings. The rich got richer and the poor remained poor as in all societies, but differing times had different responses to human need.
I liked this book, I disagreed with much of Pauls understanding of the situation, but I would wouldn't I?
This book is an easy read, full of information, offers a large reading list at the end, and is well worth spending time on. Such a shame the author has passed on.
