In recent days the Heart of Midlothian have endured a rough time. The SFA has decided to invoke a fine for players bad behaviour, ignoring the clear improvement shown in the last twelve months. This of course is to be expected form the Glasgow based old firm leaning organisation. Several players have however brought problems on to the club by their offield activities. Not that long ago Lee Wallace, an international class left back, was fined for waving an air gun about in public. A 'minor' crime but one which brings much heart searching in the media these days. Two players were discovered in a public house in possession of Class 'A' drugs, and recently Craig Thomson has been fined and put on the sex offenders list for grooming a 12 year old on the internet
The Wallace affair was a minor one in that it appears unlikely anyone was either threatened or likely to be hurt. This was the actions of a daft young man not a serious crime. Would anyone notice if another young man was involved. He was it must be said brought up as a supporter of Hibernian football club, so blame that. The two in the pub may well have mitigating circumstances, however as the court case has been delayed for a few weeks nothing more can be said at this time. Any professional footballer taking a controlled substance ought to be fired! Not only is drug taking killing and destroying many, just like alcohol abuse does, it he could affect his career badly this way. Certainly the press would never let him forget this. While I always wish to give a second chance it must be made clear that this action would be unacceptable and wrong and I would sack them. It is as I say unclear what these two players were up to and the circumstances have as yet to be revealed. They both would be a great loss to this club but would have to go if guilty!
Craig Thomson is a very different case. The facts appear somewhat muddled as publication in the tabloids emphasises the worst and never gives a balanced view. Shock and scandal sells while mature judgement does not. The Glasgow media like to display the Heart of Midlothian in a bad light of course. 20 year old Thomson has been found guilty of 'grooming' a 12 year old of his acquaintance for almost a year. He is now on the sex offenders registrar, for five years, and has been fined £4000. The Heart of Midlothian have not sacked him and the chairman, Vladimir Romanov, issued a statement in his own inimitable style, claiming, more or less, that some are out to injure the club and this is somehow part of that. They also talk of 'mitigating circumstances,' which lead them to keep the player on the books, these of course are not stated. Many fans are not happy that the player has not been sacked and naturally the Glasgow press has a story from the girls mother, a story that does not make he player look good at all. Allowing for tabloid exaggeration and a Mum paid cash for her story, it does put this lad in a very bad light.
So the Wallace situation may be placed into the past, the two awaiting a full trial may well have understandable 'mitigating circumstance' which will appear later. However if they indulge in white powder they must leave, no matter how important they are to the club! The Thomson situation leaves me pondering however. Clearly this is a boy with a problem. When I was 19 or 20 I was chasing girls of my age, they did move fast however, and for a lad in his late teens to be involved with young teens does reveal a problem. Now There is the inevitable witch hunt of course, fans baying for blood, media scramble, and 'leading people' asked to comment. Most should be rightly ignored but the opinion of the fans has to be heeded here. Craig is a boy with a problem and the club ought to offer him help but in the wider world there is no doubt he must at least be removed from the playing squad. There is no choice here, his playing days are over.
However it does appear that there is an eagerness to 'hate' this man. Society today has been influenced by political correctness to such an effect that when a paedophile is found a 'lynch mob mentality' arises, just because this is possibly the only type of human we are 'allowed' to hate! PC fashion goes further. I was struck by one comment from a fan, he complained he would not take his son to the football in case he sat near this 'pervert.' However it struck me hat his son probably gets his education from at least one lesbian and possibly a homosexual also, is this acceptable but Thomson is not? Which sexual deviation is to be hated and which accepted? Who decides? 'Hating either is wrong but honesty is required, even if 'society' has decided otherwise. How easily influenced we are! Only thirty years ago homosexuals would not have been encouraged teaching, now it is a 'hate crime' to be unhappy with this! The fashion in morals has changed almost overnight and the only people that the nation is free to hate are 'paedophiles.' I wonder if in thirty years even this will become acceptable? Hopefully, as most still care for their children, it will not!
Sadly there is a possibility that three good quality players will have to leave the club. For one it may be the end of his career, the others will be picked up elsewhere. Many fans will defend drug abuse, as they happily kill themselves slowly this way, but attack Thomson. It's a funny old world, and made worse when the directors of the Heart of Midlothian have taken the wrong approach in the situation. You cannot blame either the SFA, the old firm or the players agent for these situations. Personal responsibility is involved, and the clubs responsibility has been lacking here.
.
5 comments:
You make a good point there.
Obviously, the player's career is over, given that he's now labelled a paedophile, no club will want him.
I'm not familiar with the case, whether this is a crime committed at a distance or whether physical contact occurred.
Where do you draw the line?
As you say, it's not so long ago that homosexuality was considered not only a sin, but also a crime, and people (perhaps the most high profile case being Oscar Wilde) were jailed for that sexual orientation.
Then a very active lobby arose to tell us that homosexuality was not unnatural at all because numerous animals were doing it too, proving it not to be a vice, but simply 'natural'. So now it's okay, and schools must teach that it's as valid a choice as heterosexuality.
But paedophilia is a widespread human and animal behaviour too. It exists, and has existed all around the world from pre-history.
Rape is pretty much the routine norm in many species.
A lot of animals are prone to killing and eating their own young.
So shall we be told soon that all those are "normal" and that we must not discriminate against people choosing to follow their own desires?
People within our country, from certain ethnic groups marry their young daughters to men two or three times their age, and it's seen as okay within their societies.
I remember a friend saying, when he was discussing the case where a homosexual male couple took a bed and breakfast proprieter to court, because the couple operating the hotel insisted that their religious beliefs forbade them from allowing the two to share a bed. He said "Yesterday, homosexuality was illegal. Today it's legal. Tomorrow it will be compulsory."
One of the many sad aspects of this is Hearts will likely take action only when revenues are affected. There is talk of season tickets being returned and games being boycotted. Already today one of Hearts sponsors has withdrawn their sponsorship. Morals mean little these days - but money does.
It's a shame these things happen.
There is a clear difference between homosexuality and paedophilia. The former if indulged in by two consenting adults? What's the problem?
Paedophilia may be a 'natural' activity but by its very nature consent isn't part of the game, and even if it were then those under 16 don't have the legal right to give that consent and quite right too. Some things, no matter how 'natural' are unacceptable and beyond the pale.
One irony does strike me in all this. Can anyone explain why clubs are scrambling to sign David Goodwillie? He is I understand awaiting trial to answer a rape charge and a separate serious assault charge.
Who would pay £2 million for such an eejit?
Thomson has pitched up in Lithuania. Who'd have thunk it?
http://www.fbk.lt/index.php/naujienos/pirma_karta_lietuvoje_rungtyniaus_skotas/6533
Post a Comment