I came across this somewhere earlier and thought it a good comment on the hype regarding the film. Now I am not one for films, I prefer reality, but the story is indeed a good one. This King, forced by his renegade brother into his important position, fulfilled his duty as he saw it, in spite of his stutter, his embarrassment, and what it was doing to his family. This shy man found himself head of a nation at war, in what was indeed a war to the death! So shy was he that when taken, by force he would say, to North Africa to review the troops, he refused to leave the tent to inspect them through a combination of shyness and inadequacy. Churchill had to order him, his King, to get in a vehicle and be driven along the troops dutifully lining the desert road. That he did not run away like his brother had, that he did not stand under a falling bomb, that he stood up to his duty under such pressure is a story worth telling! No wonder he smoked himself to death! Now I am not one for Kings and Queens but this man took on this onerous and unwanted responsibility and succeeded! His happy family life was interrupted yet his wife, later known as the Queen Mother, stood by him and famously answered the question,
"Will the Princesses leave London during the Blitz?"
with "The Princesses will not leave without me, and I won't leave without the King, and the King won't leave!"
Such an answer along with the bombing of Buckingham Palace gave the royals a place at the centre of British life. They indeed were at the heart of the British Empire for a while. When his daughter Elizabeth took her place on the throne the nation was agog with wonder at a new 'Elizabethan age.' I need not point out that Scotland had not previously had such an age, but you will of course know this. This position in the nations heart remained the case right up till the time Diana and Fergie's selfishness and lack of responsibility brought this to an end. The Queen still lives her life under the influence of her fathers sense of duty, something that has also influenced Prince Charles. The nation however no longer understands this attitude and this is not helped by a media desperate to make money from the behaviour of royal children! Whether this film sticks to the story or not, and I expect the dramatisation will be excessive as always, this Kings is indeed worth investigating and he is worth respecting for his sense of duty and perseverance in such a time as his.
.
7 comments:
Edward wasn't fit to be king. Wrong man/wrong place. Good thing he stepped down.
'King,eh. And how did you get that? By exploiting the workers etc etc'
I'll be borrowing the cartoon
Is it really fair to say that his brother ran away? After all, was he not forced to abdicate because of being in love with a woman, who did not meet royal ideals? Of course, his alleged pro-Nazi sympathies are another matter.
I believe a case could be made he was a traitor. He got off easy. Tudor days would have seen him in the tower for life or beheaded. I still find it hard to believe the present queen ever deigned to visit him that one time.
Viva Republic!
I love others arguing. It saves my breath!
Leaz, Edward was a man of many talents, very popular but a bit like the Diana woman, no responsibility, although he did have the right training.
His association with Adolf caused Churchill to force him from his Portugal home and out to Bermuda as he could not be trusted. many good things in him, he just was not capable of doing the job.
Fish, Such people and 'love' is a nebulous concept. He had other women, she other men. A grasping yank was some words for her. Vast amounts of jewels went her way and she liked mixing with the 'best' people. He may have loved her, but his choice was wrong. Quite how he would have coped as King during the war I know not.
Mike, you a Republican? I'd never have guessed!
Kenfit, Steal away, er borrow as I did.....
Post a Comment