It must come as no surprise to anyone that supermarkets are ripping off the poorest. I bought two bottles of 'Hubbards Brown sauce,' Sainsburys perfectly acceptable 'own brand' sauce, the other day and noticed it now cost 54p. Not that long ago this cost 44p, then rose to 48p. This rise has nothing to do with Brexit! I did not check the beans this time but I expect to pay more for them also.
You may remember 2008, a year when Rishi Sunak and his like gambled with the word economy, broke a Dutch Bank and enriched themselves while we all suffered. Beans at both Tesco and Sainburys then cost 9 pence a tin, overnight these increased to 20 pence a tin, a profit of 11p. Considering how many tins of beans would be sold throughout the UK at both shops you can imagine the profit made. Today we see similar rip-offs from the poorest, those who now turn to 'Home Store' products rather than expensive and not always better, branded goods.
Brexit has certainly made prices rise among the many other problems it has caused. Is it, I ask, a good thing for supermarkets, who made a killing from the Covid pandemic, to raise prices on the goods many will now turn to?
I wonder, would it have been a better idea to lower such prices and bring in the customer? Such a price war might be too costly for these giant companies who tell us what to eat. Possibly their shareholders would not appreciate the kindness to those whom they do not belong amongst?
The Tory MP who claimed it was possible to make a meal for 30 pence, the one who has claimed almost £200,000 on expences, has anyone worked out how to make such a meal? Take away the cost of electric or gas, even then a sandwich would cost more than 30p to create!
Comments from Conservative MPs like that have never been lacking, the difference today is that in the past these were odd-bods on the back benches and a few catcalls quieted them down. Today however, such comments are not opposed, many loudly offer support, and the man in the street appears totally uninterested in doing something about it.
"When I was a lad..." as they say, we wanted a fairer world. 'Make Love, not war,' was a common cry, though 'Make Tea, not love,' was more common. Maybe it was different with you? We wanted to change the world for the better. Programmes like 'Cathy Come Home,' which concerned a woman losing her home, her husband and her children because of the housing crisis, had a powerful effect on the nation, today such programmes either do not exist or are replaced by women's porn or soap operas. Our generation wished to end war and make the world better. Charities abounded, protests also, change for the better was demanded. What protests exist now? The 'right' to murder a child in abortion perhaps? The 'right' to consider you are born in the wrong body? The 'right' to be what you have decided you are, want to be, or just want, is now what matters.
Concern for others, improving the world for the better, re housing, hospitals, ending war, seeking a better world, are all pushed aside for the individuals desires.
There are no protests in the streets regarding government corruption. No protests today demanding Brexit being ended. No protests regarding a lying cowardly crooked Prime Minister. No protests filling the streets regarding Priti Patels migrant policy.
Nothing.
Indeed looking at the recent local election results it is clear many still vote willingly for this government in spite of what it is doing to them! While many have risen up to oppose not enough will appear come a general election and depose this government. This when today we hear the Chancellor claim he cannot increase aid to those suffering for the cost of living as 'Due to a technical problem, the computers cannot deal with this!' Such blatant lying, accompanied with a Patel like smirk, even yet does not cause the people to rouse themselves, rise up and demand change.
What is going on in the nation?