It has long been known that TV 'News' programmes in the early morning are rarely 'News' led. Any passing film/pop/soap star can fill in the time, along with bulimic girlies and women with a grudge. A major conflict/disaster may well get a few minutes notice now and again but the majority of the viewers would rather 'pap' was to the fore. For some getting the kids out the door, preparing for work, and keeping toddlers occupied while the others are taken care off means attention for important subjects is somewhat limited. Therefore items that do not require much concentration are what appears to be popular. The TV on offer early mornings in the UK is full of 'pap' and some say popular.
Therefore news has to be found via the wireless! Until recently this was happily achieved in this region via the medium wave where the BBC World Service was available. The news was off a high standard, reports from trouble spots ignored by national media, top quality journalists, and well run programmes offered. Sadly the austerity offered by this useless coalition has led to cuts in the BBC. Naturally while back offices full of those efficient in office politics keep their jobs, and high salaries, the front line service e.g. programmes, suffer. Recently the medium wave service closed down leaving only those online able to catch the World Service. Then the powers that be shrunk the service so much that a radical, and shockingly poor, new early morning offering appeared. This BBC World Service programme was based on their African coverage, the excuse being that 70% of listeners are African! Oh yeah? The new programme goes under the name 'Daybreak,' is based in Johannesburg, South Africa, has an irritating, yet constant, silly drumbeat repeated endlessly, childlike presenters and only comes alive when the 'actual' World Service journalists appear. It has become almost impossible to listen to this programme. No doubt in Africa these folks are popular, I am not African and expect a London based BBC to broadcast with occasional African coverage as part of this, not the other way around. It sounds what it look like, cheap programming! This is more an African 5Live than proper journalism!
BBC 5Live of course broadcasts throughout the UK, a trendy female led station. Intended at fiorst for football coverage women whined as they do about 'men,' and the day is filled with second rate girlies in jobs they should not have. A feeble offering aimed at teens and 20's, and is poor at most times when football is not mentioned. It is time this was changed into a BBC 'Talksport.'
I need not waste time on BBC Scotland's puerile Glasgow based offering, and find the only radio news left is found on Radio 4. The 'Today' programme is seen as leading in the news category except when the Conservatives object to it being 'left leaning,' a phrase often used when one of their people is caught out. Yet this contains the token woman Sarah Montague, given a job simply for being female, an ageing John Humphreys, a man excellent at calling senior parliamentarians to account but all to often just happy to find fault where there is none. James Naughtie (pronounced Naughtie) is famed for mispronouncing James Hunt's name, discussing literature and opera, and offering three forty five minute programmes on the bible yet managing to avoid any reference to God while doing so, very BBC! The other two are just a waste of time and space. What ought to be a serious journalistic offering becomes all to often a tabloid paper. Small mindedness when no story is available, adverts for later programmes and an amazing amount of trivia concerning new books or films.
Each morning I wish to be informed and find less serious news available each day. Yet while the Israel problem has been well reported almost nothing has been mentioned until now concerning the Congo. Some five million people have died in the long lasting conflict there, yet it is almost unheard off, why? A wee girl banned from school for breaking rules about hair or trousers get more attention! Football results, while important, will always mean more coverage than that given to a few thousand deaths. Who mentions 'Darfur' today? Do you recall the deaths there?
I do not want bad news constantly, just serious reporting, journalism if you like, and the main channels appear to offer this less than blogs and specialist news agencies do today. The web is taking over the news.
Kweku Adoboli, working in the City of London as a dealer in the money markets, managed to lose his company around £1.4 billion. It is claimed at one point his losses were around £7.5 billion, but he managed to reclaim this. Had he not done so the Swiss Bank which employed him, UBS, may well have gone bust. He was found guilty of fraud and jailed for seven years.
The thought crossed my mind that robbing a bank gets longer sentences than murder these days. Stick a knife in someone and walk the streets in six months. Batter someone unconscious and get a banning order but rob lots of money and go down for a long time! A bank that robs the public, or fails to return the 'bail out' cash will lead to knighthoods for those at the top, alongside million pound payouts. Hmmm something wrong somewhere. Just saying....
.
7 comments:
I guess the thing is that they have to appeal to a wide listenership who would prefer to hear about new films rather than the Congo. I don't think they can always get it right but I do wish they had a bit longer to go into major issues in more depth. Do you listen to programmmes like Analysis? Often very interesting and go into things in more depth.
Jenny, Indeed such progs are good. The iPlayer is excellent for such!
Methinks I may be at least partly to blame for the Adoboli scandal. For I suspect that several of the emails that I assumed were spam and summarily ignored were actually from him and asking for my help with investing.
Please make all of the obligatory apologies for me. For I feel that you could do a much better job of it than I could since there is so much about you that needs apologizing for.
Jerry, I have passed your details to the FBI. Have a nice day.
Quote: The thought crossed my mind that robbing a bank gets longer sentences than murder these days. "Stick a knife in someone and walk the streets in six months. Batter someone unconscious and get a banning order but rob lots of money and go down for a long time! A bank that robs the public, or fails to return the 'bail out' cash will lead to knighthoods for those at the top, alongside million pound payouts. Hmmm something wrong somewhere. Just saying...." End Quote.
It would appear you are experiencing similar in your country as we are here, Down Under.
I'm forever tearing my hair out each time I hear of/read about the lenient sentences handed down by our courts. I can't understand the reasons why...the perpetrators of the crimes get a mere rap over their knuckles and sent on their way to continue doing what they do...being blots on our society!
When these criminals re-offend (and they do!), to my mind, the courts are as guilty and should be held accountable.
We've had two particular situations here in Australia at the moment; atrocious crimes committed over the past few weeks...the similarities are chilling.
One where a convicted murderer was released early; he was arrested a few days ago, and is now the alleged murderer of another young woman and he is currently being held in custody - awaiting trial!
Another which occurred a few weeks prior - a convicted felon - found guilty of serious, vicious assaults and rapes and serious (more than once) over a period of years - released back into society - to have now committed the sexual assault and murder of anoter young woman.
It beats me! Don't get me started!!
Typo in my previous comment - "another" instead of "anoter"!! I hate typos...those that I make!
Lee, Justice appears mixed up sometimes.
Post a Comment